No, it’s Paul Rudd being…Paul Rudd. How awfully lame. And I get it. It’s supposedly a picture from the Ant-Man set, but how can you tell? It could literally be a picture of Paul Rudd wondering anywhere, who’s to know?
For the one or two of you that have seen James Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy, this is the scene at the end (not the ‘button,’ or ‘stinger,’ only a tool would spoil that), and part of the reason why this is, so far, quite the most innovative Marvel movie of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).
It’s such an odd, cute little scene, bursting with the love that screenwriters Gunn and Nicole Perlman clearly felt for the material.
See Warner Bros? When you take something that under normal circumstances would be too treacly for words, and place it in the movie in a way that it serves a purpose and belongs, fans will get it.
A few months ago I misread that prospects of Disney’s Maleficent, so I have been a bit leery about trying to predict the success of films that I don’t care for (in other words, just because I don’t think much of Angelina Jolie as an actress doesn’t mean that the films she stars in will necessarily be unsuccessful. After all, I feel nothing but disdain for what Keanu Reeves calls ‘acting,’ yet it hasn’t stopped him for being quite successful at it). So, imagine my surprise to learn that Paramount’s Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles earned an estimated $65 million from from Friday to Sunday.
I just don’t see the attraction myself, but clearly there are lots of people that do.
Guardians of the Galaxy is still performing quite strongly, earning $41.5 million.
And speaking of Guardians of the Galaxy, last week was James Gunn’s birthday, and what Marvel gave him was the Infinity Stone from the Guardians, which Gunn directed.
Numeroussources reported today that Warner Bros moved the launch date of Batman V. Superman: Dawn Of Justice from May 6, 2016, where it would have competed directed with Marvel Studios tentatively titled Captain America 3, to March 25 of the same year. This ensures that it doesn’t–initially–compete with Captain America 3.
This is probably a good move on Warner Bros part because it can be argued that Captain America: The Winter Soldier outperformed Man Of Steel, despite Superman being better known, as well as a more iconic character.
Worldwide, its earned over $160 million; pretty impressive for a movie that’s based on a bunch of characters literally no one was familiar with before the movie.
Though what’s most interesting is how risky a venture it actually is, for I think three reasons:
First, there’s nothing like Guardians of the Galaxy. Marvel Studios features, from Iron Man to The Avengers, have always featured a balance of action as well as humor. That’s has always been a part of the Marvel formula, but Guardians is different. Some have described it as a comedy, and while there’s plenty that funny, it’s more a case of viewers caring and being invested in the characters–particularly Groot and Rocket–that they come off as fully-realized characters that just happen to be a raccoon and an alien tree, as opposed to just a bunch of pixels.
Second, as many have stated prior, there are no recognizable characters in Guardians of the Galaxy (other than Thanos, and I think it’s reasonably same to assume that no one is seeing it for him–which is something that Sony should keep in mind before doing a movie based on The Sinister Six, most of whom are unknown to most viewers and whom are also villains) which goes without saying is a huge risk, made even more so when you take into account that it was directed by James Gunn, who prior directed two smaller films, Slither and Super, which cost 17.5 million to produce.
For both movies. While Guardians cost $170 million.
And when you combine this fact with the fact that Gunn doesn’t particularly like making movies (around the 12: 58 mark) then the odds were more than even that Guardians could have potentially been Marvel’s weakest performer, if not a box office failure.
Let’s be clear about something: James Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy should not have worked, at least as well as Gunn (who co-wrote the screenplay with Nicole Perlman and directed) and Marvel Studios obviously think (and it’s clear that they are optimistic because based on early reviews a sequel as already been green lit for 2017). Look at what it has going against it. Gunn himself has directed two movies before, Slither, an interesting little horror comedy and Super, a not-so-interesting take on a superhero movie.
The lead actor, Chris Pratt hasn’t been the lead in ANY feature. He’s carved out a pretty impressive niche on television, and pops up occasionally in movies though before now, never as a lead.
So we have an unproven lead on top of and two characters that are entirely computer-generated. And if that weren’t bad enough, one of these computer generated actors literally says three words. FOR THE ENTIRE MOVIE. And while he’s voiced by Vin Diesel, you couldn’t tell that from watching the movie.
Oh yeah, and the other CG character is a raccoon. A talking raccoon that has a fetish for anything that goes “Boom!”
And did I mention that one of the characters is also a wrestler–who isn’t the Rock–so who knows how things are going to come out.
I found this interview with Steven DeKnight, the showrunner for Netfilix’s upcoming series based on Marvel’s Daredevil, on Superherohype. He actually give very little away, but does say that the series takes place in the 1970’s and that Vincent D’Onofrio is a really scary Kingpin.
He also mentions that things are going really well, though I suspect that he could be making the next Heaven’s Gate, and he would probably say the same thing.