Are All Things Really Better In 3D?

Twentieth Century Fox is re-releasing George Lucas’s “Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace” in 3D in 2012, according to The New York Times.

Is such a move going to help the current box office slump?

This makes me wonder:  Is adding another dimension to a pretty mediocre movie really going to make a difference to people,when money is tight, and they are already reluctant to part with what little hard-earned cash that they already have?

The decision boggles my mind, and it sounds like an epic fail to me, though there are executives at Fox that are paid a lot of cash to know these types of things.

And speaking of Star Wars:  Doesn’t anyone else think that George Lucas investing in re-doing the effects of his first three Star Wars films just a tad…odd?

And “Titanic 3D?”  Really?

2 thoughts on “Are All Things Really Better In 3D?

Leave a reply to BMN Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.