While you can get away with calling Day of the Dead: Bloodline a ‘reimagining’ of George Romero’s classic, there’s nothing ‘bold’ about it (in fact, it’s such a loose interpretation that ‘Generic Zombie Thriller’ would work just as well).
Part of what made Romero’s movies so horrific (in the best possible way) was his penchant for slow-moving zombies.
Their speed was irrelevant because they’re so numerous. They were a creeping horde of inevitability focused entirely on devouring anything living in their path.
It was this inexorable march that made them so terrifying; no matter how fast you run, no matter how far you go, they’ll eventually catch up to you.
The zombies in ‘Bloodline’ are of the more athletic variety, which may create more immediate gratification in terms of (jump) scares, though the sense of inevitability, of tension, is lessened (If not lost entirely).
Another trait of a Romero zombie movie is what I like to think of as layered storytelling (a tendency that’s effective the less you see if it. In his later movies he tended to hit you over then head with ‘MEANING!’ and ‘MESSAGE!!’ which made the movie that encased it a lot less interesting)
For instance, you can enjoy Romero’s Dawn of the Dead at face value–as simply a story of humans in a shopping mall facing off against the undead–or as a commentary on consumerism and how our need for stuff is literally devouring us.
Day of the Dead: Bloodline though? What you see is literally what you get. There’s nothing in the way of subtext, which isn’t a deal breaker if the action were more engaging or the characterization strong.
Neither of which, for the most part, happens to be the case. Though the most damning criticism of the movie is that too many characters have more to worry about from catching ‘the stupids’ than a zombie virus.
By which I mean there’re too many scenes where people die in circumstances where someone with an iota of common sense wouldn’t. If it happens one time you chalk it up to bad luck.
If it happens three or four more times, it’s really bad writing.
Day of the Dead: Bloodline is not by any means a terrible movie, just not particularly noteworthy.
I loved this film. Definately a guilty pleasure👌😎
It’s not a bad movie by any metric, just not particularly interesting. It doesn’t add anything new to Romero’s original worth talking about besides being not particularly noteworthy. It’s like 28 Days Later without the talent of Danny Boyle steering the ship.