REview: Poltergeist (2015) | Pointless-geist?

What Ya Looking At!?

I have never been a fan of remakes, mainly because they often serve no purpose other than money grabs, attempts to exploit the name of a property people are already familiar with.

Which isn’t to say that they’re not some that manage to rise above – like Jean-François Richet’s remake of John Carpenter’s Assault On Precinct 13 – but it’s hardly the norm as proven by Gil Kenan’s 2015 remake of Toby Hooper’s Poltergeist.

Kenan’s version changes a few details, Tangina (Zelda Rubinstein, who died in 2010) was essentially replaced by Jared Harris – which is an really inspired bit of casting and one of the few places where the movie shines – though it’s too faithful to the 1982 movie, which is a problem because it’s so much so that there’s no reason to watch it in the first place, especially when you could just as easily watch the 1982 movie.

And you’d be right to do so because – while this movie isn’t terrible – it doesn’t hold a candle to the original.

Though if you’re still curious about the world of Poltergeist, consider watching Gary Sherman’s 1988 movie, Poltergeist III instead, which at least takes the ideas introduced in the original movie and tries to do something novel with them. That movie is hobbled a bit by some really curious casting, production design and writing but it still holds up better than Kenan’s movie.

4 thoughts on “REview: Poltergeist (2015) | Pointless-geist?

    1. He didn’t quite register for me. I mean he was there, but little more than a presence. The whole movie was just pointless (it wasn’t terrible but since you knew where was going it seems more like a waste of time than anything else) and made me want to watch the original again.

      Which I did! Review coming soon!

      1. Right, it didn’t even have a good style to it either. Usually a remake should be presented in an entirely different way in both tone, atmosphere and dialogue. This was just junk.

        I also hated how it was marketed with the scary clown when it was just one quick little scene. The original didn’t do that at all. It was all creepy TV stuff.

      2. That’s why I prefer Poltergeist III over II and the reboot. Sure, it has a few problems (the writing and the acting are a bit clunky and some of the casting doesn’t wear well) though it makes up for it with entirely practical special effects and a twist on the original story. I really enjoyed it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.